The Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach: specifying core components of an implementation strategy to optimize care cascades in public health
Publication Date: 23 March 2023
Citation: Gimbel S, Ásbjörnsdóttir K, Banek K, Borges M, Crocker J, Coutinho J, Cumbe V, Dinis A, Eastment M, Gaitho D, Lambdin BH, Pope S, Uetela O, Hazim C, McClelland RS, Mocumbi AO, Muanido A, Nduati R, Njuguna IN, Wagenaar BH, Wagner A, Wanje G, Sherr K. The Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach: specifying core components of an implementation strategy to optimize care cascades in public health. Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Feb 14;4(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00390-x. Erratum in: Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Mar 27;4(1):33. PMID: 36788577; PMCID: PMC9926643.
Abstract
Background: Healthcare systems in low-resource settings need simple, low-cost interventions to improve services and address gaps in care. Though routine data provide opportunities to guide these efforts, frontline providers are rarely engaged in analyzing them for facility-level decision making. The Systems Analysis and Improvement Approach (SAIA) is an evidence-based, multi-component implementation strategy that engages providers in use of facility-level data to promote systems-level thinking and quality improvement (QI) efforts within multi-step care cascades. SAIA was originally developed to address HIV care in resource-limited settings but has since been adapted to a variety of clinical care systems including cervical cancer screening, mental health treatment, and hypertension management, among others; and across a variety of settings in sub-Saharan Africa and the USA. We aimed to extend the growing body of SAIA research by defining the core elements of SAIA using established specification approaches and thus improve reproducibility, guide future adaptations, and lay the groundwork to define its mechanisms of action.
Methods: Specification of the SAIA strategy was undertaken over 12 months by an expert panel of SAIA-researchers, implementing agents and stakeholders using a three-round, modified nominal group technique approach to match core SAIA components to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) list of distinct implementation strategies. Core implementation strategies were then specified according to Proctor's recommendations for specifying and reporting, followed by synthesis of data on related implementation outcomes linked to the SAIA strategy across projects.
Results: Based on this review and clarification of the operational definitions of the components of the SAIA, the four components of SAIA were mapped to 13 ERIC strategies. SAIA strategy meetings encompassed external facilitation, organization of provider implementation meetings, and provision of ongoing consultation. Cascade analysis mapped to three ERIC strategies: facilitating relay of clinical data to providers, use of audit and feedback of routine data with healthcare teams, and modeling and simulation of change. Process mapping matched to local needs assessment, local consensus discussions and assessment of readiness and identification of barriers and facilitators. Finally, continuous quality improvement encompassed tailoring strategies, developing a formal implementation blueprint, cyclical tests of change, and purposefully re-examining the implementation process.
Conclusions: Specifying the components of SAIA provides improved conceptual clarity to enhance reproducibility for other researchers and practitioners interested in applying the SAIA across novel settings.
